An Objective Look At Why Originals Are Better

It’s always fun taking a look at the differences between the original popular movies and their CGI ‘enhanced’ editions. Or is it?

This video takes a gander at the original version of E.T. The Extra Terrestrial compared to the 20th Anniversary edition.

It doesn’t actually make a case as to why the original SFX in E.T. is better than 2002’s version, filled with unnecessary CGI and uncanny valley monstrosities, but let’s be honest, you can clearly see how there is significant loss to its original charm.

At the time (2002) it may have sounded like a good idea to fix something no one asked to be fixed (because it wasn’t broken), but now it’s clear the original has a uniqueness only 1982 can deliver.

Many classic (and also completely forgettable) 80’s movies have their own special flavour the people of today expect. You don’t exactly sit down to watch a childhood favourite from the 80’s with the anticipation of bad CGI added 20 years later because ‘they had the technology available so, why not?’

Like the time many Star Wars fans were disgusted at Lucas’s attempt to ‘improve’ the original trilogy supposedly because his original vision could finally be achieved, the 2002 Anniversary Edition of E.T. The Extra Terrestrial basically made the same mistake.

There’s a few subtle changes like new shots of the city skyline, an extra tree added in here or there and some guns being converted to walkie talkies, which massively lowers the stakes in the bike/car chase, but the biggest difference is E.T. himself becoming completely CGI. 

I think we can all safely say, 2002’s version of good CGI isn’t good anymore.

When you’re limited in your creativity, somehow more heart is revealed to compensate, which in hindsight is a blessing in disguise.

If you ask me, I say leave it how it is: E.T., Star Wars, whatever. Retaining the original version of a piece of art tells a story unique to its time. There’s something about it that can’t be replicated 20 years later.

Anyway, that’s just the opinion of a self proclaimed film nerd who still enjoys watching Final Destination. 

If anything, this video is an historical look at what people think is creative at the time so you can decide for yourself whether you prefer the original or not.

Tags:

  • Jay Evans

    Editor

    Jay Evans has spent the last 8 years working as a film editor, 4 of which have been with The Initiative Production Company. In his spare time he enjoys music, comedy, experimental cooking and getting lost in the woods.

Ads

You May Also Like

How to Light a Scene and Not Break the Bank

For the aspiring film school student, it’s important to know what you need to ...

The Haunting of Hill House Will Plague Your Nightmares

Netflix continues to pump out some of the most creative and innovative tv shows ...

How to be Awesome in a World of Men

If you’re a watcher of popular movies, you’ve likely seen Marvel’s latest blockbuster, Black ...

A Great Surf Documentary is on the Horizon

I’ve never surfed before, I’ve never lived near the ocean, heck I’m not even ...

The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina Has Me Under its Spell

In an age where re-boots are around every corner, the last thing I thought ...

Everything You Need To Know For Auditions

The audition process is a hurdle all actors must overcome. There are a number ...

Don't want to miss a thing?

Subscribe and join our creative community to keep updated with our weekly-ish* Newsletter from The Independent Initiative.

*We're filmmakers, sometimes we're out filming something, on those weeks the newsletters might be more irregular. Follow The Initiative Production Company (theInitiativePro) on your favorite social media to stay the most up to date on our current productions